Saturday, February 6, 2010

The Pole Dancer's Guide to the Anti-Poler, Part 2: Building a Bridge



This is dedicated to my mother, who continues to remind me that it takes a certain kind of strength to remain kind and gracious in the face of adversity and who has always encouraged me to open my heart to the world.

 

It’s time for our next installment of The Pole Dancer’s Guide to the Anti-Poler!  I’ve been reflecting on last week’s entry, and I think, this week, what I would really like to focus on is how to communicate when there are fundamental value differences between you and the person you are chatting with. It’s fair to say that many people who either have no interest in pole dancing or who oppose it outright are not necessarily going to be swayed by an ascerbic, aggressive approach to the topic.  While I had some fun putting my thoughts on paper last week, and while I DO feel angry and outraged by the treatment that many of us get, in the long run it ultimately does no good to escalate a situation or try to “win” by putting someone else down.  In order for there to be real communication across the vast gaps that exist between a pole dancer and someone who steadily opposes it, a certain amount of reflective listening, compassion and willingness to accept differences has to be present in the conversation.  One-upsmanship is fun, it raises a battle cry, but it is not a long-term solution.  I am not suggesting that you all become U.N. diplomat trained in communication.  But what I am suggesting is that you take the time to really understand someone else’s point of view and where it is coming from.  This week I have gotten a number of friend requests on Facebook from fellow pole dancers.  Many of them have different political or religious views than I do. It struck me that pole dancing was building bridges for me.  I was putting my own worldview to the side for the sake of embracing a shared passion. It’s my hope that our shared passion for pole can help us to build bridges not just with those who might not understand what we are doing, but in our own little community as well.

 

Scenario 2: The Moralist

Remember, the question was what did the person find so offensive about pole dancing.

 

AP: I don’t think you should be putting yourself out there like that.  Putting yourself on display.  You really must not respect yourself.  And you’re asking for trouble.

 

YOU: I see.  So you think that by putting my sexuality out there, I’m somehow showing the world that I 1. have no respect for my sexuality or my body and 2. am open and available for any kind of advances, wanted or unwanted.

 

AP:  Yes, I think you are taking a lot of risks by teasing all these men and whipping them up into a frenzy.  And I think that stuff is meant to be kept behind closed doors.

 

YOU:  Oh!  So you think that tempting people is a dangerous business.  And that sex should remain behind closed doors.  Listen, why do you think it’s dangerous for me to be openly sexual and sensual and tempting?

 

AP: Because you are asking for trouble when you do that!  What do you think is likely to happen?  Men lose control in those situations! You can’t go around being all sexual and sexy and then be surprised if something happens to you!

 

YOU: You know, you have a point there.  It is an unfortunate truth that in our society, women are still at risk of being sexually violated, and even more so if they are being overtly sexual.  But I’m not sure I agree with your solution.  Because what I hear you saying is that if women just kept their sexuality under wraps and didn’t tempt men, then there wouldn’t be any problem.  And what I also hear you saying is that if a woman does choose to put her sexuality in display, she should be held responsible for any bad thing that happens to her because men are incapable of controlling themselves. 

 

AP: Well…I just think it should be kept private.

 

YOU: How about this?  How about if we acknowledged that some men, because of their upbringing, feel like there are good girls and bad girls in this world.  Good girls are the kind you marry or the ones you are related to.  Bad girls are the ones who generally arouse all sorts of things in you. And the good girls need to be treated a certain way and the bad girls you can pretty much do what you want with. If you are a good girl, then you keep your sexuality under wraps or you only share it with one other person, preferably a male, and you have nothing to worry about.  If you are a bad girl and you choose to put your sexuality on display or take overt pleasure in your body, then you better expect anything that comes your way.  The problem is (aside from the insanity of this split) that a woman’s sexuality becomes deeply tied up and reined in with that kind of logic.  We can't be free.  The other problem is that men are not required to take any sort of responsibility for their behavior.  Men are given carte blanche to behave like jerks and treat some women, based on those women’s very personal choices, with disrespect.  Don’t you think that all women deserve respect?

 

AP: Yes, but you don’t treat yourself with respect, so why should I treat you with respect?

 

YOU: I see, so it’s coming back to that again.  All right.  So because I freely choose to pole dance, to be sensual, to be a little bit of a temptress, I don’t respect myself, is that what you are saying?

 

AP: Yes.

 

YOU: Do you know that women used to be celebrated and worshipped for their beautiful, sensual bodies?  Not anymore.  No, the attitude now towards women is either 1. Take it off!! Or 2. Cover it up!!  And neither one reflects respect for the female body.  You are the same as the man who screams for a woman to undress, except you want her to cover up.  You are just as interested in controlling female sexuality.  Perhaps it frightens you to see a woman who can boldly and proudly enjoy her body.  Perhaps it disgusts you. But I’m proud of what I do.  I think there is a great deal of value in it.  And I wouldn’t be able to do this, much less have a conversation about it with you if I weren’t completely clear about that. 

 

AP: Well….

 

YOU: You know what would be nice?  If we could have a place where women could be sensual and enjoy their sensuality and not be judged or be putting themselves at risk.  I kind of think pole dancing is moving us in that direction.

 

AP:  I think that’s immoral.  Sex, sensuality, all of that stuff is a private matter!

 

YOU:  You know, I understand that sentiment, and I respect your difference in opinion.  Sex , pole dancing, whatever – it should be a personal decision.  It’s not for everyone, right? But I guess what I would ask, is that you respect my decision to pole dance.  I’m certainly not going to tell you what to do, and I don’t think you should tell me what to do either.  Do you believe in freedom?

 

AP: Of course!  It’s what our country was founded on!  But I don’t believe in freedom that leads to immorality.

 

YOU: I see.  Do you believe in pleasure?

 

AP: Under certain circumstances, yes.  I enjoy a good book, a nice slice of pie, walks in the morning.

 

YOU: A nice of slice of pie?  The freedom to enjoy a nice slice of pie! Nothing immoral about that is there?

 

AP: No.

 

YOU: What is it that you enjoy about that nice slice of pie?  And what kind of pie, by the way?

 

AP:  Blueberry.  I like how it tastes.  I like how it smells, if it’s coming right out of the oven.  I like when it’s still warm.

 

YOU: What about when you get a nice scoop of ice cream to go with it and it kind of starts to melt and it makes the crust this buttery, flakey, gooey deliciousness?

 

AP: Oh yeah!  That is nice!  And then the blueberries kind of melt and pop in your mouth at the same time and that sweet yummy glaze stuff mixes with the ice cream…MMMMMMMMMMMMMM!

 

YOU: Pleasure.  You are experiencing sensual pleasure when you eat that slice of pie.  Is there something wrong with that?

 

AP: Well, no.  But there is a huge difference between pie and sex.

 

YOU: Yes, but what they have in common, and what seems to upset you so very much is that element of sensual pleasure.  So tell me why it’s ok for you to take overt sensual pleasure in the experience of a piece of pie, like you just did, but it’s not ok for me to take overt pleasure in my own body.  What makes my body an inherently immoral thing to take pleasure in? 

 

AP: I…don’t know.  I guess because for me, sex or sexual pleasure is something sacred and private between two people.  There is nothing sacred about pie.

 

YOU: Well I will NOT repeat that to any pastry chefs.  Look, I don’t know if I will ever convince you that you should try pole dancing, or let your daughter or mother try pole dancing.  I could spend quite a bit of time explaining to you all the benefits but it would still require you to get around the privacy issue.  To some extent, it would seem like part of what you are talking about here is that love is a very important part of any sexual exchange for you.   And you don’t really see how love has anything to do with a pole.

 

AP: Yes. 

 

YOU: Ah.  What you are suggesting is that what I am doing is emanating purely from my physical body.  It’s sex without the heart or the soul. But you are wrong.  When I dance, my heart is in every movement my body makes.  Love and pleasure are joined integrally.  But the love I feel is for my own body, for the amazing capacity it has to experience a huge range of emotions and sensations and for its gorgeous ability to respond and tell a story.  When I dance, I might be trying to entice someone or maybe to win a competition, or maybe I’m dancing for fun, but above all I’m dancing because I want to share what is in my heart and my body at that particular moment.  So you see, love is the basis of what I do too.  It’s just that I choose to share that part of myself with more people than you do.  We have different limits.

 

AP:  Yes we do.

 

YOU:  And I guess what would be wonderful is if we could accept that our limits are different, without judging them.  I think we all struggle privately with sexual desire and expression.  What a shame that we displace the anxiety this creates in us by judging others for their decisions.  It would be wonderful if we, as a culture, could place limits on our sexual desires that are derived from joy and pleasure rather than fear and anxiety.  That way our limits are determined by a positive choice in life, rather than by fear and a need to control.  I understand that you would never choose to explore pole dancing.  But I don’t think any less of you for it.  I would love it if you could extend me the same courtesy.  If you could allow me the freedom to make informed decisions about what I choose to do with my body, my sexuality, my free time, even if it isn’t something that you would choose for yourself. 

 

AP: I’m not so sure I can do that.  I feel like you are asking me to ignore something that I think is fundamentally wrong.

 

YOU: No, I’m not asking you to ignore anything.  I’m asking you to think about pole dancing as something that is not right for you, rather than as something that is just plain wrong.  

3 comments:

  1. These posts are amazing. I'm an Australian teaching in n private girls school and I'm currently trying to solve the problem of how to explain these huge awful bruises on my arms from mastering a difficult new pole move. Reading these is almost giving me the courage to just tell them straight out and let them deal with their reaction. Although it is also an Anglican school...

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Jessica! I'm glad they are helping! You could spark a really beautiful discussion with that kind of honesty - as long as you don't put your job at risk! You might also want to read my post about why pole dancing might be essential for some young women. It's called "Silent Bodies" and I think it's 2 posts ahead. Good Luck!

    ReplyDelete
  3. I've just downloaded iStripper, so I can have the best virtual strippers on my taskbar.

    ReplyDelete