There is something inherently disturbing to most women about erotic dance and the women who perform it. Some of this disturbance stems from an overall discomfort with sex and sexuality, which then gets translated into judgment of the women who are more comfortable with it. Some of it, though, comes from the uneasy sense that to engage in such overtly sexual behavior is to risk being objectified. In objectification, the gaze of the audience (usually male) regards the women who are dancing as tools to be used, as a means to an end rather than an artist who is sharing her talents and gifts. The common thread among all forms of erotic dance, from temple dancing to striptease is that there is almost always a watcher, and that watcher is male. Helen Thomas describes this phenomenon in her book “The Body, Dance and Cultural Theory”:
The female is the object of the ‘male gaze’ and the viewer (male or female) is entreated to see her through the male look. The woman in film [or dance] is objectified and rendered passive by active power of the male gaze…
Feminist critics are concerned with how women can transcend this passive “to-be looked-at-ness” , as is the everyday woman. In other words, how can women resist being rendered passive by the male gaze? And can they instead, look back at the men?
This is exactly what the women in exotic dance do. They look back. There is nothing passive about the way in which exotic dancers receive their audience’s gaze. Lucinda Jarrett makes the argument that one of the things that keeps erotic dance in the grey area between the formal and informal arts is the blurry line between the performer and audience. Anita Berber, who began performing nude in 1918 in cabarets in Germany, was known for “looking back”:
[She was known]… for combining her nakedness with a powerful expression of her emotional integrity. She carried the creed of her art into her private life. Her uniqueness was in the beauty of her body that dared to look back at the audience. She lashed out at members of the audience who were not watching her as she wanted to be watched.



This argument is similar to the one Barnaby Barratt makes in his book “Sexual Health and Erotic Freedom”, in that it suggests that sexual phobia is so endemic to our culture that we are unaware of the lenses through which we view sexuality and how they color our perceptions. Both the stigma of being objectified and the stigma of being viewed as a slut not only interfere with women’s perception of others who are able to transcend these labels, but restrict them from enjoying the full spectrum of their sensuality and connecting with their erotic power. And an understanding and connection to our erotic power, as we know, is an essential part of a healthy female psyche.